Porn does not serve a useful purpose. Ban it.
Nathan Chadwick · · 4 min read
TLDRRead the short version
- Porn does not serve a useful purpose. Its reliable outputs are addiction, secrecy, and damage to people who use it and people who love them.
- It ruins relationships by outsourcing desire to a screen and training comparison against an endless catalogue of strangers.
- It lowers confidence in men: arousal tied to pixels, performance anxiety with real partners, and shame that shrinks social courage.
- Trauma is not a side effect. Coercion, regret that never dies online, and viewers desensitised to degradation are part of the machine.
- The NoFap community named the pattern the culture preferred to joke about: stop, and clarity often returns.
- Personal willpower is not enough against a free, algorithmic pipeline. Stop production. Ban distribution. Shut it down.
The lie we were sold#
For years the culture treated pornography as private entertainment. A victimless habit. A stress valve. Sometimes even a "healthy" outlet.
That story collapses under what people actually live through: ruined relationships, eroded confidence, compulsive use that feels impossible to quit, and real trauma for people caught in the industry and in its aftermath.
Porn does not serve a useful social purpose. It trains addiction, distorts intimacy, and hollows out the capacity for real connection. It should stop being produced, and it should be banned everywhere.
Addiction is the product#
Porn is engineered for escalation. Endless novelty. Extreme categories. Infinite scroll. The same loop that keeps people hooked on other digital vices.
What starts as curiosity often becomes a ritual: secrecy, escalating content, loss of control, and a life organised around the next hit.
That is not freedom. It is dependence sold as liberation.
When something's main reliable outcome is compulsion plus damage to work, sleep, honesty, and relationships, stop pretending it is a neutral consumer good. The industry does not accidentally addict people. Escalation is the business model.
It ruins relationships#
Porn teaches a script that real partners cannot and should not match: constant variety, zero responsibility, bodies as disposable props.
Partners notice. Trust erodes when someone chooses a screen over the person next to them. Desire gets outsourced. Presence disappears. Resentment grows.
Many couples describe the same arc. Less affection. More comparison. More secrecy. More fights about "just a habit."
Intimacy needs attention and reciprocity. Porn trains the opposite: extraction without care. A culture that normalises that is a culture that quietly sabotages marriage, dating, and the possibility of being fully present with another human being.
It lowers confidence in men#
For a lot of men, heavy porn use does not feel empowering. It feels shameful.
Confidence drops when arousal is tied to pixels instead of a real person. Performance anxiety rises. Social courage shrinks. The gap between fantasy and ordinary human bodies becomes a quiet source of self-contempt.
Men are told this is normal male behaviour. Many of them experience it as the opposite of strength: avoidance, isolation, and a self-image built on consumption rather than character.
Quitting often comes with a hard truth. The habit was not making them more masculine. It was making them smaller.
Trauma is part of the machine#
"Consenting adults" is the slogan. The reality is messier and darker: coercion, economic pressure, filmed regret, content that outlives every attempt to leave, and viewers desensitised to degradation because degradation is the genre.
Viewers are not sealed off from that harm. Compulsive use can leave people anxious, depressed, dissociated, and haunted by images they never meant to wire into memory.
Partners of users carry secondary wounds: betrayal, body insecurity, the sense of being measured against an impossible catalogue.
Calling this entertainment is a way of refusing to look at the cost.
What the NoFap community got right#
Whatever you think of every claim in every forum thread, the NoFap community named something mainstream culture preferred to joke about.
Many people feel trapped, foggy, ashamed, and relationally numb. And they feel clearer when they stop.
NoFap is not a perfect movement, and it does not need to be. Its core insight is practical and human: abstinence from porn, and often from the compulsive habits around it, can restore attention, mood, confidence, and the desire for real connection.
Men and others comparing notes, setting streaks, admitting relapse, and trying again is what a culture does when an industry's product is breaking people and institutions look away.
That community should not have to exist as a DIY recovery ward for a legal addiction factory. Prevention beats endless individual willpower contests against a multi-billion-dollar pipeline designed to defeat willpower.
Ban production. Ban distribution. End the pipe#
Personal self-control campaigns are not enough when the product is everywhere: free, algorithmic, and aimed at kids' devices as easily as adults'.
If a substance's dominant effects were addiction, relationship destruction, confidence collapse, and trauma, we would not shrug and call it a hobby.
Pornography should be treated as a public harm. Stop production. Ban distribution. Enforce real age barriers and platform liability. Refuse the lie that endless filmed degradation is a civic good.
"Consent" marketing does not cancel the social wreckage. "Private choice" does not cancel what happens when an entire generation's sexuality is outsourced to an industry that profits from compulsion.
Useful things build people up. Porn trains them to consume other people as content.
That is not culture. That is corrosion.
And it is past time we shut it down.