Avoiding toxicity, choosing ND friends, and protecting my nervous system
Nathan Chadwick · · 6 min read
TLDRRead the short version
- Toxicity and negativity are contagious. Media is built to amplify them because outrage and threat keep people watching.
- The people you spend time with can do the same job as a bad feed: leave you braced, smaller, and scanning for the next hit.
- I am choosing people who treat me well. Reciprocal care is not a luxury for me. It is nervous-system hygiene.
- I want more neurodivergent friends than neurotypical ones. Shared wiring means less translation, less masking, and less explaining why a small thing hit hard.
- Due to how my brain is wired differently, I am prone to triggers and feel them harder than a lot of people seem to. Protecting my nervous system is not fragility. It is how I stay functional.
The quiet decision#
I am getting more deliberate about what I let near me.
Not in a dramatic, burn-every-bridge way. In a practical way. Toxicity and negativity are not just moods floating in the air. They are inputs. They land in the body. They change how safe the next hour feels, and for me that change is rarely small. That is due to how my brain is wired differently.
So I am cutting the volume down. On the feeds. In the rooms. And, carefully, in who I keep close.
Why the media amplifies it#
Most of what people call "the news" and "the timeline" is not designed to leave you steadier than it found you.
Attention is the product. Outrage travels. Threat travels. Contempt travels. A calm, complete, proportionate piece of information does not. Platforms and outlets learned that long ago, and the reinforcement loop around outrage is not a conspiracy theory. It is an engagement strategy with a nervous system attached to the other end.
You open the app for five minutes and leave with:
- A sense that everything is on fire
- Someone to hate
- A comparison that makes your own life feel smaller
- No useful next action
That is not informing you. That is dysregulating you and calling it staying informed.
I do not need a constant drip of other people's worst moments in order to be a decent person. I need enough signal to act where I can, and enough quiet to recover. Endless negativity is not moral seriousness. Often it is just a machine that found your amygdala and pressed it again.
People can be a feed too#
The same pattern shows up in friendships and relationships.
Some people leave you clearer. Some leave you braced. After an evening with them you are flat, replaying tone, checking if you said the wrong thing, or carrying a mood that was never yours to begin with.
That is not always abuse with a capital A. Sometimes it is chronic negativity. Constant put-downs dressed as jokes. Competitive misery. Drama that needs an audience. The person who only contacts you when they need a dump site for their chaos, then disappears when you need anything back.
I have written before about what belittling and push-pull do to a nervous system, and about choosing people who make safety feel ordinary. The short version is the same: proximity is a form of input. If someone regularly leaves you smaller, that is data.
Choosing people who treat me well#
I am done confusing endurance with loyalty.
Treating someone well is not complicated. It looks like:
- They do not need me diminished to feel bigger
- They celebrate wins without a jab underneath
- They can disagree without contempt
- Contact leaves me steadier, not scrambled
- Care goes both ways
That last one matters. I spent years pouring into people and calling it love, then wondering why I felt empty. Working on myself taught me something blunt: if you only feel valuable when you are useful to someone who does not look after you, you will keep volunteering for depletion.
I want people who treat me well because I treat them well. Reciprocity. Not a performance of niceness followed by private erosion. Not hot-and-cold that trains you to chase the soft version. Actual mutual regard.
If that means a smaller circle, fine. A small circle that feels safe is worth more than a large one that keeps my body on alert.
Why I am looking for more ND friends#
I am neurodivergent. Autistic traits, a history of social anxiety, and a body that does not shrug things off the way a lot of neurotypical people seem to, due to how my brain is wired differently. I wrote about how bullying and autism shaped that. This year I am still learning what that wiring needs in practice.
One of the clearest needs is company that does not require constant translation.
With a lot of neurotypical social life, there is a second job running underneath the conversation: mask, read the room, guess the unspoken rule, recover afterwards. Even when people are kind, the cost can still be high. Small talk as a test. Indirectness as a default. "Why are you taking that so personally?" as a reflex when something lands hard.
Around other neurodivergent people, more of that drops away. Shared context. Literal communication that is not treated as rudeness. Special interests that do not need to be watered down to be allowed in the room. A better chance that "that overwhelmed me" is heard as information instead of drama.
I am not saying every NT person is unsafe, or that every ND person is automatically a good friend. Plenty of neurotypical people are steady and kind. Plenty of neurodivergent people are not. What I am saying is preference and probability. I recover faster, mask less, and feel more like myself with people who already understand the operating system. That is who I want more of in my life.
Protecting a trigger-prone nervous system#
This is the practical part.
Due to how my brain is wired differently, I am prone to triggers. A tone, a sudden change of plan, a cold message, a throwaway comment, a feed full of contempt: things that other people bounce off can put me into a state that takes hours to climb out of. When that happens, the thoughtful part of me is not fully online. The body has already decided there is a threat.
That is not me being "too sensitive" as a moral failing. It is a stress response that fires hotter and longer because of that wiring, and because a nervous system trained by bullying, social threat, and relationships that kept the alarm ringing learned to stay on high alert. Feeling more is not the same as regulating better. I wrote about that mix-up elsewhere. The point for daily life is simpler: if the hit is bigger for me, the buffer has to be bigger too.
So I protect it on purpose.
- Shrink toxic inputs. Mute, unfollow, leave the group chat, stop calling negativity "staying informed".
- Limit access. Not everyone gets my time, my special days, or my recovery window.
- Choose reciprocal people. Especially ND people I do not have to perform normality for.
- Notice bracing as data. If my body tightens before I speak, that is information, not weakness.
- Recover like it matters. Sleep, training, quiet, routine. The boring stuff that keeps the system from living in threat mode.
Protecting my nervous system is not me becoming cold. It is me staying available for the people who have earned the soft version of me. You cannot pour from a system that is constantly flooded.
What I am aiming for#
Less manufactured crisis. Less second-hand rage from a screen. Fewer people who treat my calm like something to poke. More friends who get the wiring without a lecture. More days where my baseline is quiet enough that a real problem can still be handled like a real problem, not like another fire on top of a fire.
I am not trying to live in a bubble. I am trying to live in a nervous system that is not permanently on call for other people's chaos.
That is the filter now. Media, rooms, friendships: does this leave me more able to be myself, or less? If the answer is less, it does not get to stay just because leaving would feel awkward.
Awkward is temporary. A burned-out nervous system is not.